tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670812027273632828.post703883564238026557..comments2023-11-02T06:50:42.777-07:00Comments on billierosie: THE CHANGING FACE OF BEAUTYbillierosiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00288997506566830393noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670812027273632828.post-53044700904725082222012-09-02T07:07:25.354-07:002012-09-02T07:07:25.354-07:00It certainly is interesting, how our preferences c...It certainly is interesting, how our preferences change. I guess for a huge part, the idea of what constitutes beauty, was dictated by fertility -- wide hips and belly and large breasts. But it is certainly a subject worthy of further investigation and I too would buy the photo book if anyone brought it out.<br /><br />Yes, I think the 1960s models are the most attractive, particularly Jean Shrimpton and a lady I was talking about a few weeks back, Christine Keeler.billierosiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00288997506566830393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670812027273632828.post-2752371822559783662012-08-31T08:08:40.508-07:002012-08-31T08:08:40.508-07:00This is a really interesting post - I'd actual...This is a really interesting post - I'd actually buy the photobook if anyone ever took on this subject in full. Think of the "beauties" in paintings by Reubens and Titian, to see how much our template has changed. The only constant factors seem to be youth and an absence of disease/scars ... though probably for much of human history, that WAS enough to make you stand out from the crowd.<br /><br />Personally, btw, I find the 1920s women the most attractive, followed by the 1960s models. Janine Ashblesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00840188081214225153noreply@blogger.com